Surviving 'Nam at Hold the Line - 'It Was the Best of Times, It Was the Worst of Times..."

    A squad of Viet Cong stalk towards the players in Friday's "Surviving 'Nam" game at Hold the Line

"It was the best of times, it was the worst of times" -- for the Americans in my Vietnam game, that is! Same rules, same scenario. Different players, different tactics and dice rolls...and wildly different results! I ran my Surving 'Nam rules this past weekend at Hold the Line convention. Both games were full with four players ready to take on the role of a U.S. platoon sent to search Stone Buddha Market for signs of it being a Viet Cong supply depot. Both games had experienced miniatures players who understood tactics. So, why did the U.S. go down to their worst defeat in my eight play tests on Friday afternoon, yet succeed better than any so far on Saturday?

    American troops from the Big Red One infantry division advance towards a village in Vietnam

I have had some time to analyze the two different games since then. Yes, some of it was due to some seriously bad luck. On the whole, the players rolled much better on Saturday than they did on Friday. However, I don't think more Viet Cong popped up to attack them on Friday, though. It wasn't "How Many?" but rather "Where?" the V.C. showed up. I think it came down to half the American force getting bogged down in a killing field on the tabletop. There is a rice paddy and open area on one side of the board edge where the U.S. soldiers enter. The two right flank squads were unable to press past this area and into the village. Meanwhile, the HQ element and other squad mostly went the other direction and made good progress, separating the two. Unfortunately for those on the right, most of the of the V.C. that arrived on table showed up right across the river from them in the light vegetation along the river. The soldiers themselves had little cover, and all too often failed their rolls to avoid enemy fire. When other soldiers would run to check on the Down soldiers, and try to get them back on their feet or at worst drag them to cover, they were shot and went Down, too.

    On Saturday, one U.S. squad crossed the river and effectively guarded the platoon's flank that way

In my Surviving 'Nam rules, a soldier that is targeted by enemy fire must try to roll above the foe's Danger Level modified by cover. If they roll exactly the Danger Level (or one above or below), they are Pinned. If they roll below that, but more than a "1" (natural one is out of action), they are counted as Down. However, if a friendly soldier spends an action checking on a "Down" soldier, the player rolls on a chart. Results can vary from out of action, disabled, walking wounded, lightly hurt, or unhurt at all (maybe the bullet hit an item of equipment and knocked the force knocked them down and stunned them). The rule rewards historical behavior. Soldiers would check on their friends who had been hit, and help patch them up. 

    Right flank squad led by Sgt. Rogers motioning his men forward, crossing the river into the scrub

In Friday's game, the two squads that advanced across the rice paddy and open ground did so slowly, often failing their activation rolls, which causes the draw of a card from the event deck (which can possibly bring fresh V.C. onto the table). As the left wing disappeared into the jungle or buildings on the left,  those squads on the right began to take casualties and get bogged down. Joe M, playing the far right flank -- and frankly responsible for many of the atrocious dice rolls -- at one point had all five of his soldiers out of action. Jeff G, the next squad in, tried to send guys out to help, but as they ran to their buddies they were shot down, too. Jeff cleverly used smoke grenades to block off the visibility of some of the V.C., but there simply were too many enemy opposed to just one part of the American force.

    Sgt. Summers points his squad towards the village & its market, which they are ordered to search

The other thing that really hurt the Americans on Friday was the HQ element was out of position to spot the bulk of the V.C. Two of their biggest "guns" are in the HQ squad -- the M60 machine gunner and the lieutenant himself and his ability to call in fire missions (off-board artillery) on the enemy. I honestly remember the M60, whose suppressive fire can sometimes effectively pin an entire V.C. squad, firing only ONCE the entire game! And the lieutenant had "gone left" so wasn't in position to see the overwhelming amount of V.C. popping up to attack the American right and call in fire on them. There are two "Fire Mission" event cards that come up in the deck, and there was a significant drought of them being drawn during the Friday game, as well. Because a number of cards call for the event deck to be reshuffled, it can mean that some cards simply never come up, while others come up more often because the reshuffling puts the former on the bottom and the latter near the top. I actually like how this makes each game different. 

    A V.C. machine gun team inside a bunker ambushes the American advance

So, even though the Colonel on the Horn card came up and modified the player's mission on Friday, the players eventually got to a point where they felt there was no hope of collecting their wounded and getting off the table. For the first time in my eight personal play tests, my players cried "Uncle!" and admitted they had lost the mission. They were simply going to have to leave wounded on the field to be able to get the other two squads off the table. I actually have 7-8 other groups play testing the rules in the U.S., U.K, and Italy, and that has happened once or twice to others. However, that was before I made changes and toned down the lethality. This was the first time I witnessed it in action myself, so I was trying to figure out why it happened, and especially when I felt I had the mechanics "bloodiness" tweaked to the right level.

    'Incoming!' V.C. mortar fire begins to impact near the HQ squad - the lieutenant seems unimpressed

Although it may seem I am blaming the HQ squad player for being out of position, it was the group's plan that his squad move to the left. All players tried their hardest to do the tactically correct thing to do. Jeff's smoke grenades were a clever tactic that mitigated the danger of an enemy machine gun bunker and a deadly V.C. sniper. Ultimately, I fee the players were victim of bad luck with most of the enemy showing up concentrated in exactly the wrong place for their plan. And when it came to critical rolls, they seemed to fail them regularly. All of that said, I had some serious soul searching going on that night! 

  V.C. machine gun has downed one G.I. already, and is one of the deadlier enemy weapons in the game

I honestly felt that I had fixed Surviving 'Nam from being too bloody for the Americans. adjusted to the correct level. And then suddenly, I had the worst outcome in all of my play tests! Over dinner and beers, I talked to my friends about it. My friend Jim W, who had played in the previous weekend's play tests in World At War (and had his group win handily), chimed in. He said that is the beauty of a balanced scenario and rules. Things CAN go to Hell if the players meet the "perfect storm" of bad luck and unfortunate tactical choices. He argued that, if the players can't struggle when luck is not going their way and they make bad choices, then the scenario or rules are too easy. Jim felt it was bound to happen if you play a scenario often enough. What he said made sense, and I looked forward hopefully to Saturday's game.

    On Friday, the U.S. soldiers swarmed the bunker and took it out with grenades and M16 fire

So, what went different, Saturday to make the same scenario go so well? As I mentioned earlier, their rolls were better. However, remember that patch of light vegetation across the river? The right flank squad instead crossed the river and occupied those two patches of vegetation. Most of the event cards that place new enemy troops on table stipulate the new enemy be placed in cover NOT occupied by the player's forces. The American right wing moving quickly along the opposite bank of the river cut off any enemy squads from arriving there -- except for isolated individual V.C. soldiers popping up in spider holes. Plus, my friend Mike S (playing Surviving 'Nam for the first time) made it a point to use his M60 machine gun regularly and keep his lieutenant where he could best see patches of cover where enemy troops might spring up. Even though Mike didn't get many fire mission cards (bad luck there), his HQ squad was in better position to support either wing of his platoon. He maneuvered his M60 gunner into position to suppress the enemy bunker and its machine gun when it appeared. Then, he shifted position to hammer the biggest enemy main ambushing force when it finally arrived on the table.

 The players on Saturday also did a better job of keeping their squad leaders near their heavier weapons support (M60 for the HQ and M79 grenade launchers for the other squads). This allowed them to use the squad leader's free action he can hand out each turn and give those weapons a second chance to fire every turn. Between the grenade launchers and M60, effective fire was promptly laid down on enemy immediately after they appeared. More than once, a squad of V.C. would appear, and within short order, grenades fired by the "bloop gunners" would devastate their ranks. In fact, when the Colonel on the Horn card came up on Saturday, the players decided to hold off obeying his directive to break contact and exfiltrate. Instead, they chose to continue with their mission searching the market awhile longer. They felt they had the situation under control, and indeed the results showed that they did.

    Many villagers scattered quickly once the Americans arrived, this poor granny froze on the bridge

Thankfully, even the players who cried "Uncle!" on Friday night said they had a blast with the rules. The rules have been tightened up to the point where, after my play tests, the gamers really don't have any rules changes they would suggest. Instead, they say it worked great and excitedly talk about other periods the mechanics would work for, as well. It is always satisfying as a GM to provide a good time for your players. It was also a thrill for me to see the players gel together as a team and work their hardest to help accomplish the mission. After running my Viking Town Raid earlier this year, and running Surviving 'Nam twice at conventions, I am becoming more and more of a fan of cooperative miniatures games. The players really seem to enjoy reacting together as a team and covering each other's backs. Their smiles when they accomplish their mission or overcome the more dangerous enemies, such as the V.C. machine guns and snipers, is a reward for me as a GM. 

It may be time now to pivot my play testing to designing and test-driving scenarios instead of looking for things in the rules that need changed. I'll shift my own writing from making changes in mechanics to editing the text of the rules so that they are clear and well organized. To be sure, you will read more of my own solo Vietnam games and accounts of my Big Red One platoon as I play test more scenarios. I also want to run through an entire year campaign -- 12 missions -- and see if anything else comes up that I might need to fix in those mechanics. So, stay tuned and see how the platoon fares in its upcoming fourth mission when it is one third of the way through its time "In Country." Hopefully, it will be the best of times for them and not the worst...haha!

MINIATURES Acquired vs. Painted Tally for 2025

• Miniatures acquired in 2025: 290
  
• Miniatures painted in 2025: 269

TERRAIN Acquired vs. Painted Tally for 2025

• Terrain acquired in 2025: 53
  
• Terrain painted in 2025: 67

SCATTER Acquired vs. Painted Tally for 2025

• Scatter acquired in 2025: 136
  
• Scatter painted in 2025: 212